The main visible difference is that Ace 3 has a 20% brighter screen than Ace 2. You’re not going to notice much difference from the grayscale OLED of the older device, although this does have the benefit of not being so power hungry. Other specifications include a touchscreen PMOLED display on Ace 3. Both devices weigh around 70 grams and have straps that are interchangeable. That’s only slightly larger than the 1.45 x. The actual dimensions of the third generation device come in at 1.47 x. The edges are curved and the single physical button on the left looks to be more shielded by the silicone band. As the side-by-side picture below shows, the look is a bit streamlined. It has a similar chunky appearance that appears to be fairly robust. No doubt, the fact that all the info leaked out ahead of launch day did not help.ĭesigned for kids aged 6 and up, the tracker largely resembles the second generation device. Garmin Vivofit Jr 3 vs Jr 2: fitness tracker for kids comparisonįitbit Ace 3 was expected to arrive on March 15th but the company has released it earlier.Garmin Vivofit Jr 3 vs Fitbit Ace 2: the battle of kid friendly trackers.Fitbit Ace vs Ace 2: is the upgrade worth it?.But which should you choose? Read on to find out. If you’re in the market for a kids fitness tracker, you will not go wrong with a Fitbit. Reportedly, it was due to land by the end of 2020 but perhaps the Google acquisition and/or coronavirus situation delayed things. There’s even talk of an upcoming 4G smartwatch for little ones. For a long time it only focused on wearables for adults. Now we have the third iteration.įitbit is slowly making a name for itself in this space. The first was an Alta lookalike, the second a more robust device for younger kids. The company has so far dished out three generations of activity trackers solely dedicated for little ones. The wearable had leaked earlier so there were few real surprises on launch day. Fitbit has, yesterday, made official the Ace 3 kids fitness tracker.
0 kommentar(er)
